My shopping cart
Your cart is currently empty.
Continue ShoppingOur expert team can take care of it. Just click Get Expert Install and we'll send you an email when it's ready!
If everything looks okay to you, you can Ignore this warning.
Flexible magnetic sheeting is available in different thicknesses, and choosing between 15 mil, 20 mil and 30 mil can significantly affect how the finished product feels, handles and performs.
In general, increasing magnetic thickness provides more magnetic material and can increase holding capability when the formulation, magnetization and test conditions are otherwise comparable.
But thickness is not the only factor.
The performance of flexible magnetic sheeting also depends on its magnetic formulation, magnetization pattern, pole pitch, target steel, surface contact, air gap, load direction and application environment.
So the right question is not simply:
“Which thickness is strongest?”
A better question is:
“Which thickness provides the right balance of magnetic holding, flexibility, weight, handling and durability for my application?”
Quick Answer
15 mil is a thinner, lighter option suited to applications where flexibility, lower weight and economical material use are priorities. 20 mil provides a useful middle ground between handling and magnetic performance. 30 mil contains more magnetic material and is commonly selected when greater holding capability, body and durability are required. However, thickness alone does not determine real-world holding performance.
A mil is one thousandth of an inch:
1 mil = 0.001 inch
15 mil = 0.015 inch ≈ 0.38 mm
20 mil = 0.020 inch ≈ 0.51 mm
30 mil = 0.030 inch ≈ 0.76 mm
In flexible magnetic sheeting, these dimensions describe the nominal material thickness. Depending on the product construction, additional printable surfaces, coatings, laminates or adhesives may affect the overall finished thickness.
Specification Tip
When comparing magnetic products, confirm whether the published thickness refers to the magnetic layer itself or to the complete finished construction.
Thickness influences several characteristics at the same time.
A thicker flexible magnet generally contains more magnetic material per unit area, assuming a comparable formulation. It also tends to have more body and greater resistance to bending than a thinner version.
Increasing thickness can therefore affect:
Choosing a thickness is therefore a system decision, not simply a magnetic-strength decision.
| Characteristic | 15 mil | 20 mil | 30 mil |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nominal thickness | 0.015 in / ≈0.38 mm | 0.020 in / ≈0.51 mm | 0.030 in / ≈0.76 mm |
| Relative flexibility | Higher | Medium | Lower |
| Relative weight | Lower | Medium | Higher |
| Material body | Thinner | Intermediate | More substantial |
| Potential holding capability* | Lower | Intermediate | Higher |
| Typical design priority | Lightweight, flexible applications | Balance of handling and holding | Greater holding, body and demanding applications |
*General comparison assuming otherwise similar material formulation, magnetization and test conditions. Exact holding performance must be confirmed from the specific product data and application.
15 mil flexible magnetic sheeting is relatively thin and lightweight.
It can be a useful choice when the application benefits from:
Possible uses can include labels, promotional pieces, lightweight signs, identification pieces and other indoor or controlled applications.
However, a thinner magnet has less magnetic material available than a comparable thicker construction. If the application introduces a meaningful air gap, poor steel, vertical loading or additional layers, the available holding margin may become more important.
20 mil magnetic sheeting occupies a useful middle position.
It provides more magnetic material and body than 15 mil while remaining more flexible and lighter than a comparable 30 mil construction.
This can make 20 mil attractive for applications where you need a balance between:
It can be appropriate for general signage, displays, labels, printed magnetic products and converted components when the application does not require the additional body or holding capability of a thicker material.
Selection Insight
20 mil should not automatically be considered the “best” thickness simply because it is between 15 and 30 mil. The correct choice depends on what the finished product actually needs to do.
30 mil flexible magnetic sheeting provides a more substantial magnetic construction.
Compared with thinner versions of otherwise similar material, it generally offers:
30 mil material is often considered when the application is more demanding, the finished piece is larger or additional holding capability is desirable.
It may also be considered for vehicle magnetic graphics when the specific magnetic product, vehicle surface and application conditions are suitable.
However, thickness alone does not make a magnetic graphic suitable for vehicle use. Vehicle construction, surface material, paint condition, contours, installation, maintenance, speed, weather and the magnetic product’s specific recommendations must all be considered.
Important
Do not use a simple rule such as “30 mil = vehicle safe.” Vehicle magnetic applications require the correct product and proper installation on a compatible ferromagnetic surface.
When comparing the same magnetic formulation and magnetization under the same test conditions, increasing magnetic material thickness can increase magnetic holding capability.
But comparing thickness alone across different products can be misleading.
Two products with the same nominal thickness may perform differently because of differences in:
This is why a 20 mil product from one construction cannot automatically be assumed to provide the same holding performance as every other 20 mil magnetic sheet.
For more information about the magnetic pole pattern, see SSKC-027 — Pole Pitch and Multipole Magnetization.
Engineering Principle
Thickness is one performance variable — not a complete magnetic specification.
Flexible does not mean that every thickness behaves the same way.
As thickness increases, a comparable magnetic sheet generally becomes less flexible and develops more body.
This can be advantageous when a finished piece needs to remain flatter or feel more substantial.
Thinner material can be easier to:
Thicker material can provide more body but may also require more consideration during rolling, shipping, installation and converting.
The finished construction matters as well. A printed face, laminate, adhesive or other layer can change the stiffness of the final product.
Increasing thickness also increases the amount of material per unit area.
For a small magnetic label, the difference may be relatively minor.
For a large-format graphic, however, the difference between 15 mil and 30 mil can become significant in terms of:
This creates an important design trade-off:
Do not add magnetic thickness unless the application benefits from it.
A thicker product can provide additional performance, but unnecessary thickness can also add weight, cost and handling requirements.
A thicker flexible magnet cannot compensate for every weakness elsewhere in the magnetic system.
Holding performance also depends on the target surface.
Important factors include:
Any non-magnetic separation between the flexible magnet and its target creates an effective air gap.
Even a relatively thin gap can influence magnetic performance, particularly with the short-range multipole fields commonly used in flexible magnetic materials.
A thicker magnet may improve performance in a particular construction, but it does not eliminate the effects of poor contact or excessive separation.
For the fundamentals of flexible magnetic construction, see SSKC-026 — Flexible Magnetic Sheeting Explained.
Thickness can also affect how magnetic material is processed.
Depending on the specific product and equipment, considerations may include:
A thicker magnetic material should not automatically be assumed to be compatible with the same printer or converting process as a thinner product.
Similarly, the ability to physically feed a material through a printer does not by itself confirm print quality, dimensional stability or long-term suitability.
Always confirm the requirements of the specific magnetic product and production equipment.
The following table provides a practical starting point rather than a universal specification.
| Application Consideration | Thickness Direction to Evaluate | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Lightweight labels | Start with thinner material | Lower weight and good flexibility may be sufficient |
| General magnetic signage | Evaluate 15 or 20 mil first | May provide an efficient balance when direct steel contact is available |
| Larger magnetic graphics | Evaluate 20 or 30 mil | Additional body or holding capability may be useful |
| Application with additional non-magnetic layers | Test thicker and/or higher-performance constructions | The air gap can reduce holding performance |
| Vehicle magnetic graphics | Use product-specific vehicle guidance | Thickness alone does not determine suitability |
| High-volume converted parts | Use the minimum thickness that reliably meets the requirement | Can reduce material, weight and processing requirements |
A thicker product may provide additional magnetic capability, but it also adds material, weight and stiffness. If 15 or 20 mil reliably meets the application requirement, additional thickness may provide little practical benefit.
Nominal thickness alone does not define magnetic performance.
The magnet and the steel form a system. Poor target steel can limit performance regardless of magnetic thickness.
Paint, vinyl, laminates, dirt and uneven surfaces can all separate the magnet from the steel.
Printer compatibility depends on the complete media construction and the equipment, not simply whether the material is 15, 20 or 30 mil.
A magnetic sheet used horizontally does not necessarily behave the same way when supporting a vertical load where friction and sliding become important.
A practical selection process is to define the application first.
Consider:
Then choose the minimum thickness and magnetic construction that reliably satisfies the complete application requirement with an appropriate performance margin.
Flexible Magnet Selection Principle
Thickness + Magnetic Formulation + Magnetization + Pole Pitch + Target Steel + Air Gap + Surface Contact + Load Direction + Friction + Environment = Real-World Performance
This is why thickness should be treated as one part of the magnetic system rather than as a stand-alone measure of quality.
When comparing otherwise similar magnetic formulations, magnetization and test conditions, a 30 mil construction generally has greater potential holding capability because it contains more magnetic material. However, exact performance should be compared using product-specific data.
Under otherwise comparable conditions, the thicker construction generally has more potential magnetic holding capability. Different formulations or magnetization patterns can change the comparison, so thickness alone should not be used as the complete specification.
It depends on the required holding performance, size, target steel, air gap, flexibility, weight, fabrication method and environment. Use the thinnest construction that reliably satisfies the complete application rather than automatically selecting the thickest product.
Do not select a vehicle magnetic product by thickness alone. Use magnetic material specifically suitable for the intended vehicle application and follow the relevant product guidance for surface compatibility, installation, cleaning, removal and environmental conditions.
Additional magnetic material can improve performance in some constructions, but every air gap still affects the magnetic interaction. The result depends on the complete magnetic formulation, magnetization pattern, gap, target steel and geometry.
It may require less cutting force than a thicker version of similar construction, but the appropriate cutting method depends on the complete product, thickness, tooling and production process.
Printable versions may be available in different thicknesses, but print compatibility depends on the specific product construction and printing equipment. Thickness alone does not confirm compatibility.
Yes. Magnetic formulation, particle loading, magnetization, pole pitch, manufacturing process and test method can all affect performance even when nominal thickness is the same.
Published magnetic holding values should be interpreted together with their test conditions. Real-world performance may change with the target steel, air gap, surface condition, load direction, friction, temperature and finished construction.
For critical applications, test the actual magnetic material on the actual target surface under representative operating conditions.
Start with SSKC-026 — Flexible Magnetic Sheeting Explained to understand how flexible magnetic material works.
Continue with SSKC-027 — Pole Pitch and Multipole Magnetization to understand how the pole pattern influences magnetic behaviour.
Learn about magnetic composition in SSKC-028 — Ferrite in Flexible Magnets: Strontium vs Barium.
Compare flexible materials with compact rare-earth magnets in SSKC-029 — Flexible Magnets vs Neodymium Magnets.
For graphic systems, see SSKC-030 — Magnetic vs Magnetic-Receptive Materials.
Tell us the dimensions of your finished piece, target surface, application orientation, printing or lamination requirements, environment and how the magnetic product will be installed and used.
Simple Signman can help you compare flexible magnetic sheeting thicknesses and constructions for printing, signage, converting and industrial applications.
Simple Signman — a leading Canadian source for flexible magnetic materials and neodymium magnets.
Sharing our magnetic expertise since 1969.
Our expert team can take care of it. Just click Get Expert Install and we'll send you an email when it's ready!
If everything looks okay to you, you can Ignore this warning.